Gladiator II (2024)

Listen to this post:

It’s been over two decades since Ridley Scott’s Gladiator (2000) burst onto the screen, delivering a gripping tale of revenge, honor, and sacrifice that defined the modern historical epic. The original not only entertained but left audiences pondering its timeless themes of power and redemption. Now, Gladiator II aims to bring us back to the Colosseum. With bigger battles and a new generation of gladiators ready for combat, the sequel guarantees thrills but also raises the question: was this return to Rome really necessary?

via YouTube

The story picks up sixteen years after Maximus’ death, centering on Lucius (Paul Mescal), the boy whose life Maximus saved. Now grown, Lucius embarks on his own odyssey of vengeance after the murder of his wife and the invasion of his home by Roman General Marcus Acacius (Pedro Pascal). Meanwhile, Rome languishes under the chaotic rule of twin emperors Caracalla and Geta (Fred Hechinger and Joseph Quinn), whose reign threatens to tear the Empire apart. While the stakes are high, the narrative often feels less personal than its predecessor. Where Gladiator balanced spectacle with Maximus’ emotional arc, the sequel leans more heavily on action, leaving some of its thematic weight underexplored.

Visually, Gladiator II is a feast for the senses. From fighting wild animals to an audacious naval battle staged in a flooded Colosseum, Ridley Scott’s knack for crafting breathtaking action sequences is on full display. The scale is undeniably impressive, but the reliance on CGI is more noticeable this time around. The original’s practical effects – like the use of real tigers – added a visceral edge that the digital creatures can’t quite replicate. Still, the production design, costumes, and John Mathieson’s cinematography maintain a visual continuity with the first film, grounding the opulence of Ancient Rome in rich textures and bold colors.

The cast delivers mixed results. Denzel Washington, as the manipulative Macrinus, is easily the standout, bringing charisma and malice to a character who dominates every scene he’s in. It’s clear he’s having fun with the role, and his energy is infectious. Paul Mescal is solid as Lucius, though his character often feels one-dimensional, and his motivations lack the depth that made Russel Crowe’s Maximus so compelling. Pascal does well with limited material, but the twin emperors feel more like caricatures than real threats, lacking the complexity of Joaquin Phoenix’s Commodus.

A returning Connie Nielsen, however, shines once again as Lucilla, bringing much-needed emotional resonance. Her scenes with Mescal provide the film’s most poignant moments, adding layers to their mother-son relationship that feel more compelling than Lucius’ rushed quest for vengeance.

Ridley Scott’s direction, while polished, feels cautious. At 86 years-old, Scott still demonstrates his talent for spectacle, delivering massive set pieces and a grand sense of scale. However, the bold risks and emotional depth that defined some of his earlier work are less present here. The pacing is brisk, rushing from one action sequence to the next without giving the characters or their arcs enough time to breathe. This leaves key players like Pascal’s Marcus and the twin emperors feeling underdeveloped. Perhaps, at this stage in his career, Scott is more focused on putting out as much work as he can – and there’s nothing wrong with that. He clearly still loves making movies, and “Gladiator II” reflects that passion, even if it doesn’t quite meet the bar set by the original.

So, are we still entertained? Yes, but just barely. Gladiator II delivers the action and drama you’d expect from a Ridley Scott historical epic, but it lacks the emotional punch and originality to match its award-winning predecessor. It’s big and exciting at times, but it doesn’t stick with you in the same way. In the end, the movie reminds us why the original Gladiator is still so beloved – and why this sequel, while decent, doesn’t quite live up to its legacy.