The Grey is a deplorable example of exploitation, cruelty,
and nihilism masquerading as philosophy. Here is a “survivalist” story in which
the survivors are given the same reverence as horror movie victims, who appear
to have depth and yet are merely awaiting their turn to die on cue. Not merely
die, but become playthings for “nature,” which in this case is about as
unnatural as it gets. It’s bad enough we have to endure a plane crash and
several shots of bodies strewn throughout the wreckage; those that survived are
left stranded in the frozen wilderness of an Alaskan forest, at which point
they’re each stalked by a pack of wolves. In a more thoughtful movie, the wolves
would be depicted as products of their own environment, hunting only when
necessary. Here, they’re depicted as psychotic killing machines with borderline
supernatural powers.
To be sure, we also see examples of hypothermia, oxygen deprivation,
drowning, and bleeding to death. But the wolves are the real culprits. They
attack the human characters with little to no warning. In many cases, they pop
out in sudden bursts, like skeletons in one of those cheap carnival funhouses
you ride with on dates. Their intention, we’re told, is not to eat but merely to
kill. We know this not just because of how they tear their prey to shreds, but
also because of numerous shots of them surrounding the characters. In one,
several pairs of eyes appear out of the darkness and glow fiercely. In others,
we see rows of them as they prowl low to the ground. Most of the time, we only
hear them howl in horrifying unison. And to think director Joe Carnahan allowed
just one shot of a full moon emerging from a veil of clouds. Too bad those three
seconds were captured on a Queasy Cam.

The humans are led by a man named Ottway (Liam Neeson), a wolf hunter for a
petroleum company. He’s established during opening sequences as deeply
introspective in matters of death, in part because of memories of his dead wife,
in part because of what he does for a living (for which he should be ashamed of
himself). Mostly, though, it’s because of a letter he’s writing to no one, which
is narrated for the benefit of the audience. This is followed shortly thereafter
by a suicide attempt in which he puts the working end of his rifle in his mouth.
I don’t remember if he chickens out or is stopped, and to be perfectly honest, I
don’t really care. He and a group of laborers board a plane bound for Anchorage,
only for the plane to crash dramatically. Out of all the survivors, he quickly
appoints himself leader. They gather all the necessary supplies such as airplane
fuel for making fires, but it seems he’s more interested in what waits for them
in the wilderness.
He’s a wolf whisperer, you see. He knows how wolves think, feel, and behave.
And so he spends much of the film warning the survivors about them with the tact
of a counselor telling a ghost story to frightened young campers. The survivors
try to keep their wits about them. Little do they know that they’re actually
starring in a horror movie, and that in horror movies, there’s usually a pecking
order applied to the victims. Typically, they’re stock characters with little to
no depth. In this case, they’re developed on emotionally manipulative
conventions. One has a young daughter he would have loved to see again. Most
have women or relatives they left behind. And then, of course, there’s the one
guy that questions the leader’s authority and spends most of the film angrily
rubbing everyone the wrong way. Here’s one character that should be eaten by
wolves just because it will finally shut him up.
They’re developed in other obvious ways, most notably by having discussions
and debates on life, death, God, and the afterlife. This eventually leads to
more personal admissions, including Ottway’s description of his Irish father,
who was a hard drinker and a bit of a poet. What I don’t understand is why the
filmmakers bothered to develop the characters at all, given the apparent
pointlessness of their very being. The message, as I understand it, is that you
shouldn’t love or laugh or even live, because in the end, it’s all going to be
taken from you. Is there any particular reason why we should leave a movie
feeling more hopeless than when we first entered? Why not consider the insane
notion that life, though short, is beautiful and precious, and that, regardless
of what does or does not exist spiritually, what we do while we’re alive truly
does matter?
Alas, the filmmakers are much more interested in men being eaten by wolves.
How pleasant. The film is based on the short story “Ghost Walker” by Ian
MacKenzie Jeffers, and while I haven’t read it, I have a sneaking suspicion that
The Grey is remarkably faithful to it, if only because Jeffers
gets half of the screenplay credit. How sad that he seems to place no value on
humanity or nature. I cannot recall the last time I left a movie feeling so
depressed, so defeated, so angry that it had to make a point about how there is
no point to be made. I presume it will be warmly received by the horror and
action aficionados, as it regularly delivers the cheap thrills. Those of you
looking for something deeper may want to consider bringing along a box of
tissues, a dose of an antidepressant, and the phone numbers of several
well-respected therapists. Trust me, you’re going to need them.

|